A newspaper reporter reads a study that surveyed children and then, reports that a high percentage of children recognize Joe Camel, the cigarette spokescharacter, but fails to report that the study also found that a much higher percentage of children indicated very negative attitudes toward smoking. Is this a proper use of secondary data? What are the ethical dilemmas involved, and as a business researcher, what is your responsibility to ethically report your research findings, especially with products such as cigarettes?
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 1 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Get Free Quote!
389 Experts Online