University Canada West
MBAF
502: Quantitative Reasoning & Analysis
Assignment:
Abstracting a Quantitative Article involving Hypothesis Testing
Prof:
Brian Amouzegar
Student
Name:
Important: Please DO NOT alter formatting.
Key point |
APA referencing of the article, including a hyperlink to UCW library
webpage [5 points] |
|
Problem statement and research question(s) [10 points] |
Problem Statement: College students are at major risk in foodborne illnesses, due to the consumption of unhealthy food and not
following food safety practices Research Question: Do Under Graduate students enrolled in personal health
course in a University have knowledge of food safety practices to cope with foodborne illnesses? |
Null (H0) and Alternative (Ha) hypotheses [10
points] |
Null Hypothesis Under Graduate students of a University
enrolled in personal health course have fair knowledge in food safety
and practices. Alternate hypothesis Undergraduate students of a University
enrolled in personal health course do not have knowledge on food safety and practices. |
Test statistic (s) [10 points] |
Test statistic: t-test is used for
testing 968 undergraduate
students of a University. Variable description: Independent t-test was
taken for an independent characteristic
sample that is age, gender, class standing, ethnicity and students feeling of
risk of foodborne diseases. Demographic characters
were represented as independent variables and total points of food safety
knowledge score were listed as dependent
variables. |
Rejection region, or significance level (α), and p-value,
if reported [10 points] |
Rejection region: From t-table, anything
below or after 95% region is the rejection region. Significance Level: it is 95% confident. Value of α= 5 %, 2.5% on both
ends (two tailed ) p-value: p< 0.05, p= 0.012. As p-value is not equal to p0, we are
rejecting the null hypothesis. |
Assumptions made about the sampled population [15 points] |
The sample population is
normally distributed. n>=30, np^ >=15 &
nq ^ >=15. As n=968, np^=786 & nq^=182. |
Method of sampling [10 points] |
Sampling Distribution: The
number of students
taking the survey (size) is 968.
The number of students responded is 786
and remaining students who did not respond are 182. Implies n=968, np^=786
and nq^= 182. Hence, the sample population is normally distributed. Methods: Questionnaire-based survey. For the purpose of unbiased testing, a t-test was taken independently on different demographic
characters. At the end of the survey, safety knowledge scores were compared by demographic characters. And the
mean score of female students (45%) was slightly higher than the male score. (43%) |
Evidence-based conclusion [20 points] |
Based on analysis of p-value p =0.012. α=0.05 we are rejecting the
null hypothesis and concluding that Undergraduate students enrolled in personal health course do not have much knowledge of food safety and
practices. The data obtained from
the research could be useful in preventing and mitigating the unsafe food consumption habits of young
adults. |
Get Free Quote!
381 Experts Online