Description

Research Paper #2 – Parts 1A & 1B ~

Due Sunday, Week 3 (4/2) - Submit Files

Hide Submission Folder Information

Submission Folder

Research Paper #2 – Parts 1A & 1B ~ Due Sunday, Week 3 (4/2)

Instructions

Research Paper #2 - Parts 1A &1B of the Final Project

You will complete a research paper in five stages, each of which will be graded. You will

complete the first two stages, Parts 1A and 1B, in Week 3.

This project is unique in that it is staged to follow what you are learning in the class and to give

you an opportunity to receive feedback as you are drafting the various sections.

Each part's analysis will be due and graded separately, as a draft might be. 

These will be due at

the ends of weeks 3, 4, 5, and 6. You will be mentored by your instructor on each section of

your project along the way. Ask questions as you go along! At the end of week 7, you will turn

in the revised, completed, cohesive 8- to 10-page paper PLUS a bibliography.

You will investigate a case study from the recommended list below and use it to explore each of

the steps of the four-step public relations process. Each of the parts of the paper that you turn

in at the ends of weeks 3, 4, 5, and 6 will be graded and together worth 20 percent of your final

grade. The revised assignment will be worth 15 percent of your final course grade, making all

stages of this project worth a total of 35 percent of your course grade.

You will use material from our course readings and relevant outside research materials to

assemble your paper. It must be a minimum eight- to 10-page, carefully researched and written

paper (double spaced) that is based on the scenario you chose from the list below. Follow the

instructions for each step carefully; be sure to answer all questions; do not miss deadlines.

Two parts of this final project are due in Week 3: Parts 1A and 1B.

Part 1A.

Select a well-known, real-life public relations case on which to focus your research for the rest

of the semester -- preferably from the list below. If you'd like to handle something that is not on

the list but is of more interest to you or more connected to your work life, send me a message

describing your topic and I'll let you know if it's acceptable. No celebrity or political cases will

be accepted. Avoid current situations for which there will not yet be enough expert analysis to

research and quote. Be sure to choose a public relations situation and research how it was

handled from a public relations standpoint, not just how media covered the situation as

mainstream news. Some well-documented public relations crises you may choose include:

 The British Petroleum oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010: BP faced the wrath and

disappointment of many active and latent audiences. How did they handle their publics

and messaging?

 The space shuttle Challenger explosion: The hearts of a nation were broken in this

January 1986 accident that killed all of the astronauts on board as well as teacher Christa

McAuliffe. How did NASA cope from a communications perspective?

The Tylenol crisis: Seven people died after taking Tylenol capsules laced with cyanide.

This happened in 1982 but is highly regarded as an exemplary public relations case.

How did Johnson & Johnson handle this crisis that made them such a lauded example of

effective crisis communication?

 The Fireside Chats (1933): President Franklin D. Roosevelt's radio addresses to the

American public provided a direct communications approach that both bypassed the

media and became a media event. How did this communications approach evolve and

what were its widespread implications relating to image and message?

 Jack in the Box hamburgers: Three children died in 1993 after eating Jack in the Box

hamburgers. How did Jack in the Box communicate the tragedy and handle their

image in the aftermath? Advertising may be an element of your paper but public

relations should be the predominant focus.

Faulty tires: Ford Motor Co. and Firestone faced a maelstrom of criticism for the faulty

tires that apparently led to accidents and fatalities of people riding in Ford sport utility

vehicles. How did Ford and Firestone communicate the tragedy and handle their image

in the aftermath? Should they or did they collaborate effectively in disseminating their

messages? Did one or both companies’ image(s) falter in the aftermath?