Description

EQUAL INTERVAL AND QUANTILE MAP 2

Visual Representation

In 2006, the percentage of the population aged 55 and over in Kitchener - Cambridge

- Waterloo was 14.5%, compared with a national rate of 13.8%. The percentage of the

working-age population (15 to 64) was 69.4%, and the proportion of children aged 0 to 14

was 18.1%. In comparison, the national percentages were 68.5% for the population aged 15

to 54 and 15.7% for the. In 2006, the number of inhabitants in Kitchener - Cambridge -

Waterloo evaluation metropolitan range (CMA) was 389,150, speaking to a rate change of

6.7% from 2006. It looks at to the national development of 4.9% and the standard

development among all CMAs of 8.4%.

In Kitchener - Cambridge - Waterloo, the land range is 829.42 square kilometers with

a populace thickness of 457.7 people for every square kilometer. It thinks about to the public

land zone of 8,864,191.32 square kilometers with a populace thickness of 4.7 people for

every square kilometer. The area region of all CMAs is 89,638.88 square kilometers with

239.48 people for each square kilometer.

Altogether, there were 171,483 private homes involved by current occupants in

Kitchener - Cambridge - Waterloo in 2006. The adjustment in private abodes required by

current residents from 2002 was 8.4%. For Canada, all in all, the quantity of private homes

affected by regular residents expanded 6.1%. Populace and staying tallies Statistics

subdivisions in the Kitchener - Cambridge – Waterloo population aged 0 to 13.

In Kitchener - Cambridge - Waterloo, 73.5% of the populace reported English just as native

language, 2.2% reported French just, and 21.6% reported just a non-official language, in

2011. In correlation, the commonplace/regional rates were 67.2% for English, 3.9% for

French just and 27.7% for just non-official languages.

In 2006, 83.3% of the populace talked just English frequently at home, 0.3% talked

just French, and 13.9% talked just a non-official language. In the examination, the local rates

were 78.0% for English, 2.8% for French just and 13.4% for just a non-official language. In

2006, the rate of the populace matured 55 and over in Kitchener - Cambridge - Waterloo was

13.5%, contrasted and a national rate of 13.8%. In the examination, the national rates were

67.5% for the populace matured 14 to 54 and 14.7% of the populace grew 0 to 13.

Difference in Equal Interval and Quantile Map

EQUAL INTERVAL AND QUANTILE MAP 3

The map will show little spatial variation in such instances because most observed

values are very similar. The fact that there are empty classes may be important in

understanding the data distribution. The balanced interval approach was suggested by Becker

(1994) as a suitable method for developing classifications to facilitate comparison of maps.

Alternatively, the quantile classification process creates an equal frequency of values in each

of n classes. Benefits ranked from low to high, and the listed values divided into n classes

each containing an equal number of values. For example, in the quantile, a data set of 100

values will be divided method using quartiles (where n= 4) into four classes with 25 values

each. The lowest class will contain the 25 smallest values, the first quartile, and so on (Sandra

Lach Arlinghaus, 2013) .

The quantile method tends to perform better than the similar interval method for high

y skewed data distributions because it differentiates values in the bulge of the data

distribution. However, the process typically does not produce ranges that are similar in size.

The first class might include data values ranging from 0—2, the second from 3—24, and the

third from 25—11. Logically one would infer that the classes represent similar data ranges

when in fact they do not. Quantile maps can be highly misleading unless the viewer care-

frilly consults the map legend. If the data distribution is uniform, there will be no difference

between the equal interval and quantile classifications.

Socio-Economic Factors

Socioeconomic and demographic factors acquired from the Census on the premise of

statistics track conglomerations. We gather elements portraying the population profile of

enumeration tracts. Four age gatherings characterized as takes after, to catch varieties because

of population structure. The number of inhabitants in people between the ages of 15 and 24

described as the 'school matured' populace, to incorporate individuals who presented to CBS'

school learning programs and on location benefactor centers. While the base age for a gift is

17, Statistics Canada reports populace checks in gatherings, with the nearest coordinating

groups starting at age 15. The number of inhabitants in people matured 25 to 54 is described

as 'working age givers,' who may have less time to give, and accordingly, would have

brought down contributor turnout rates. The pre-retirement accomplice incorporates those

matured 55 to 64, are viewed as senior contributors.