European colonialism is often depicted as a force of greed that exploited the African people for financial gain; however, one could also argue that colonialism served a moral purpose and was mutually beneficial to both parties. How would one argue this se
history
Description
European colonialism is often depicted as a force of greed that exploited the African people for financial gain; however, one could also argue that colonialism served a moral purpose and was mutually beneficial to both parties. How would one argue this second viewpoint, and do you agree that the benefits brought by Europeans outweighed the negative effects? Why or why not? What would you propose be done for Africans to overcome any negative effect of European colonialism? Hi these are the instructions from my professor: This is a Gordon Rule course, which means that it is a writing intensive course. 5 double spaced pages each, with .12 font. Written in Chicago manual Style AAA. You must avoid quotations at all cost. The professor wants to hear student voices. To cite (or, in your text, make reference to an already published text). I will upload the chapters soon. Thanks. Africa in World History: From Prehistory to the Present. (3rd Ed.) Gilbert, Erik and Jonathan Reynolds Pearson (2012) ISBN-13: 0-205-05399-8
