SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
FLORENCE v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
OF COUNTY OF BURLINGTON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 10–945. Argued October 12, 2011—Decided April 2, 2012
Petitioner was arrested during a traffic stop by a New Jersey state
trooper who checked a statewide computer database and found a
bench warrant issued for petitioner’s arrest after he failed to appear
at a hearing to enforce a fine. He was initially detained in the Burlington County Detention Center and later in the Essex County Cor-
section Facility, but was released once it was determined that the
fine had been paid. At the first jail, petitioner, like every incoming
detainee, had to shower with a delousing agent and was checked for
scars, marks, gang tattoos, and contraband as he disrobed. Petition-
er claims that he also had to open his mouth, lift his tongue, hold out
his arms, turn around, and lift his genitals. At the second jail, petitioner, like other arriving detainees, had to remove his clothing while
an officer looked for body markings, wounds, and contraband; had an
officer look at his ears, nose, mouth, hair, scalp, fingers, hands, arm-
pits, and other body openings; had a mandatory shower, and had his
clothes examined. Petitioner claims that he was also required to lift
his genitals, turn around, and cough while squatting. He filed a 42
U. S. C. §1983 action in the Federal District Court against the gov-
government entities that ran the jails and other defendants, alleging
Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violations, and arguing that per-
sons arrested for minor offenses cannot be subjected to invasive
searches unless prison officials have reason to suspect concealment of
weapons, drugs, or other contraband. The court granted him sum-
mary judgment, ruling that “strip-searching” nonindictable offenders
without reasonable suspicion violates the Fourth Amendment. The
Third Circuit reversed.
Held: The judgment is affirmed. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
FLORENCE v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
OF COUNTY OF BURLINGTON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 10–945. Argued October 12, 2011—Decided April 2, 2012
Petitioner was arrested during a traffic stop by a New Jersey state
a trooper who checked a statewide computer database and found a
bench warrant issued for petitioner’s arrest after he failed to appear
at a hearing to enforce a fine. He was initially detained in the Bur-
Arlington County Detention Center and later in the Essex County Cor-
section Facility, but was released once it was determined that the
fine had been paid. At the first jail, petitioner, like every incoming
the detainee had to shower with a delousing agent and was checked for
scars, marks, gang tattoos, and contraband as he disrobed. Petition-
er claims that he also had to open his mouth, lift his tongue, hold out
his arms, turn around and lift his genitals. At the second jail, pets-
toner, like other arriving detainees, had to remove his clothing while
an officer looked for body markings, wounds, and contraband; had an
officer look at his ears, nose, mouth, hair, scalp, fingers, hands, arm-
pits, and other body openings; had a mandatory shower, and had his
clothes examined. Petitioner claims that he was also required to lift
his genitals, turn around, and cough while squatting. He filed a 42
U. S. C. §1983 action in the Federal District Court against the gov-
government entities that ran the jails and other defendants, alleging
Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violations, and arguing that per-
sons arrested for minor offenses cannot be subjected to invasive
searches unless prison officials have reason to suspect concealment of
weapons, drugs, or other contraband. The court granted him sum-
mary judgment, ruling that “strip-searching” nonindictable offenders
without reasonable suspicion violates the Fourth Amendment. The
Third Circuit reversed.
Held: The judgment is affirmed.
Get Free Quote!
271 Experts Online