1.
Introduction
Gabriel
Marcel’s (1889-1973) involvement during World War I in the Red Cross movement
gave him the most memorable and soul searing encounters of his life. Because of
the world war, many had lost their loved ones; mothers lost their husband and
children, wives lost their husbands, brothers and sisters lost their parents, etc.
The broken human spirit sought his services, though he was shattered, yet with
courage he responded as personally and humanly as possible. It was during this
time of his life that he developed his great regard towards human dignity and human
values. From this experience, he grasped the pulse of existence and, because of
his spontaneous interest in others he renounced even more emphatically the
facile intellectualism and abstraction that had contributed so much to the
dehumanization of persons.[1]
We
live in a multi-fragmented 21stcentury. Our planet appears to be
fractured, ruptured, broken and bleeding from all sides even today. The key
reasons for this brokenness are as follows, Firstly, materialism which is
rooted deep in the culture. It is extremely difficult to comprehend human
values beyond materialism. The scientific mentality, a materialist descendant,
pretends that human beings should be able to solve every challenge between lives
to death without concerning to something beyond themselves. The outcome of this
is God-talk and philosophical ideals are thrown away. This kind of attitude
brings humanity to a complete despair and does not have a permanent solution to
many of the troubling human difficulties. There can be no union or communion
between individuals. As a result, generally, friends become foes, companions
become conspirators, and families turn into hell, peaceful nations torn into
pieces and lively ones turned into devils.
Finally,
what we find is human being in despair, distress, nausea, boredom and suicide.
As a supreme spectator having set him/herself in the pursuit of an all
object-universe and placing him/herself in the prison of objects, totally
forgetting the mystery dimension of reality, the modern human being suffers
from a terrible illness i.e., the loss of sense of being and personhood, a loss
of the sacred dignity of being human.[2]
Virtues
such as faith, hope, fidelity and love hardly can make sense. The faith
enhances faith in oneself and hope is not feasible for the Absolute. Hope is hollow and futile because there is no
possibility of transcendence. Any bonds of brotherhood binding communities and
directing the social behavior are hard to imagine in this kind of environment.
The cord which binds humanity breaks apart when there is no fraternal link. The
universe is perplexed and splintered.
In
this situation, the theme “From
Brokenness towards Reconstruction of Human Dignity: A Critical Analysis from
the Narratives of Gabriel Marcel” is relevant. Marcel was hoping to some sort of better antidote
to end the brokenness of the biosphere. Despite the world’s distorted nature,
men and women must return to the true source and means of survival to satisfy
themselves. Yet, how and what way is this possible? Intersubjectivity[3]
which is encountering being in beings (the other as a subject) can make this
conceivable. It helps everyone to accept every human being’s intrinsic dignity.
It can only pave the way for the harmonious life in the community, society and
the world and communion of beings by fostering humans.
Humanity
must restore the components of love and faith, hope and transcendence, solidarity
and integrity in social discourse, as well as figure out a way of
re-establishing it as immortal and eternal ideals. This will lead to absolute
freedom, a growing society of love and unencumbered comradeship, etc. Man’s
transparency to his fraternity by love, faithfulness, confidence, participation,[4]
presence,[5]
openness, friendliness and availability is only meaningful when he is a form of
everlasting communion.
That
is what we mean by saying that human beings are self-transcending. His
ego-centeredness equips his world to exploit and reap for his very benefit. It
encourages him to a life of fellowship with others, in which the positive is
harnessed and appreciated creatively. In addition, this leads him to a
super-human culture where such good deeds are eventually realized to give him
access to a fullness of being. Marcel’s ontological
exigence[6]
that is, the intersubjectivity lies here. In human beings, it is a constant
search for perfection, a perpetual and infinite search, a constant awareness
that this self-fulfilling search lies outside of itself. It depends on some
force; some are even and is more than self. It is like a willingness to be
packed with a void, and a desire to sleep deep inside.
Marcel
claims that human existence remains a futile challenge and an eternal torment
until this desire is fulfilled. The growth of hope, based on faith and
motivated by love, eventually results in a union between the being and the
Absolute Thou (for Marcel, God). Furthermore, he thinks mankind is doomed to
ruin when we attempt to refute such a profound and restless religious
experience.
[1] Cf. Vincent P. Miceli, Ascent to Being. Gabriel Marcel’s Philosophy of Communion,
Desclee Company, Rome 1965 5.
[2] Cf. Patrick Bourgeois,
“Marcel and Ricœur. Mystery and Hope at the Boundary of Reason in the
Postmodern Situation”, in American
Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2006) 3, 421.
[3]Intersubjectivity is openness to others. It is where one stands in a vital
relationship with others. One joins and shares the experiences of one another
which includes a deeper union of interactions such as passion, loyalty, and
hope. (Cf. John Marson, D., “The Majesty of Intersubjectivity. Maritain and Marcel
Contra Cartesian Subjectivity”, in Distinctions
of Being. Philosophical Approaches to Reality, ed. Nikolaj Zunic, American Maritain Association, Washington
2013 145-156).
[4] Participation refers to an internal act that consciously engages the entire
personality of a subject - it is not merely a perception of meaning, nor an
intellectual intuition, nor a logical notion. (Cf. Richard J. Kroner, “Existentialism and
Christianity”, in Encounter 17 (1956)
219-244).
[5] Presence refers to the personal mode of life. And since the current cannot
be effectively isolated from its existing, presence often implies the existing
entity, effectively pointing to the comparison of existing with objectivity and
impersonal existing in this use. (Cf.
John B. O’ Malley, The Fellowship of Being. An Essay on the
Concept of Person in the Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel, Martinus Nijhoff,
The Hague 1966 96).
[6] Ontological Exigence is human
persons’ internal hunger and demand for fullness and meaning.
Get Free Quote!
422 Experts Online