In 2018, almost 11% of the world’s
population was undernourished. Over the years, there had been a trend of
decline in hunger. Unfortunately, since 2015 the statistics are showing an
increase in the number of people in the world that are undernourished. Food
insecurity is more than simply feeling hungry. It is a person who is not being
able to provide food for themselves and the ones they take care of. To tackle the issue of food insecurity, it is
essential to look beyond hunger (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2019). The
four criteria that must be covered to be food secure are listed below:
In this reaction paper I will discuss all four
criteria based on, amongst others, seminars I have attended and literature I
have read about this topic.
Availability
‘Annually, enough food is produced to feed the world.’ (Timmermans, 2019) This
statement was made by Toine Timmermans, a Dutch professor at the Wageningen
University. According to his research, there is enough food available for every
single person on this earth. However, over 820 million people were undernourished
in 2018 (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2019). So how come that there is
this large group of people, which is increasing in number, who do not have
access to the food they require to live a healthy life? This is a hot topic in
my studies in the Netherlands (International Food and Agribusiness) about which
I have had many discussions in class. There are a few reasons in my opinion
that in some parts of the world there is not enough food available to feed
everyone in it.
Firstly, conflict and war. When there
is political unrest or war in an area, food production and distribution is
often disturbed. Besides that, if a country is very dependent on the import of
food, and the relation with the providing countries gets disturbed, it could
have great effects on the net supply of food in that country. In my opinion, it
is the duty of the leaders of the country to make sure that their people can
provide themselves with enough food. But, if there is war or other unrest in an
area, usually the poorest who are often in the agricultural sector, are harmed
first. They are producing for self-subsistence, but often also for the
community directly around them.
Secondly, the occurrence of natural
disasters such as floods, mudslides and so forth are devastating for the yields
of agricultural produce. These natural tragedies often occur in the poorest
parts in the world and directly affect them the most. The reason that it
affects them the most is that they have the least expertise and tools to
protect themselves against possible threats and harm caused by nature. Often
because they also lack the financial needs to protect themselves against the
damages by for example insurances or crop protection.
Lastly, climate change. The second
and last reason go hand in hand. There will be more natural disasters and
extreme weather events in the future that will threaten the yields across the
world. Together with bad farming practices, such as improper soil management
causing losing a vital part of the soil which takes centuries to recover, or
misuse of chemicals which make pests and diseases more resistant to those
chemicals, will all threaten the yields across the globe. In my opinion, it is
very disturbing that there are still people, often very influential people in
the diplomatic world, that deny climate change and say it is a hoax. Those
people should be stepping forward and should do their best to make a change
because if they don’t, the group of people that are not food secure will only
increase in the future. Recently, Greta Thunberg has formulated the urge of
acting against climate change really well: ‘Entire
ecosystems are collapsing, we are at the beginning of mass extinction. And all
you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth’
(Thunberg, 2019). Now I can only hope that the leaders of the world will act
upon their words to push this world in the direction of progressive change for
all.
Accessibility
As mentioned above, there
is enough food produced in the world to feed its entire population, however,
many people do not have access to food. How is that possible? The first reason
being economics. As Hans Rosling mentioned in his TedTalk, there is an uneven
distribution of money in the world. He showed statistics about income
distribution in the world. It stated that in 2006 the poorest 20% of the world
population only accounts for 2% of the total world income (Rosling, 2006).
Since 2006, not much has changed in the distribution of income. The poorest in
the world can’t afford the food that is available in shops or markets. For them
to become able to buy the food they need, requires a tremendous structural
change in the way the economy and world politics are organized these days.
However, in my belief that will be very difficult to do so, since the need for
power and success are embedded in the nature of many people, particularly many
political leaders who will do anything for success. Also, the Rostow’s stages
of economic growth are very applicable to see at which stage a country is in
food security. As mentioned in Katie Willis’ book, many countries are still
going to several stages of development other countries have already gone
through and might even have reached the end goal of ‘mass consumption’ (Willis,
2005). As discussed in class, is it fair to say as ‘the Western world’ to the
countries that are going through rapid changes in terms of economic and social
development that they are not allowed to experience the richness and wealth as
‘we, the Westerners’ have experienced? I am personally still contemplating this
issue. On the one hand, I think that I cannot say to someone that he is not
allowed to have the same experiences and feeling of being wealthy whilst I have
had the opportunity and luck to be able to be at the front seat of it. On the
other hand, I think that to get to that state of wealth, our society has
crossed many ethical boundaries in order to achieve, in what we think and are
educated to believe is wealth. I think it is our job to protect the actual
wealth in the world and those are our natural resources. Concluding, we should
reform the definition of mass consumption and wealth so that it can meet
everyone’s state of well-being of this generation and the generations to come.
The second reason that people facing
food insecurity due to inaccessibility of food is inadequate infrastructure.
Some people might be economically able to afford the food they need, but the
means to get to the food are insufficient. I think that this sounds like the
easiest problem to solve. However, I do realise that there are many more
aspects related to it. Usually, when the infrastructure is insufficient, the
country is either not able to or not willing to providing the people living in
it with facilities that could make their lives better. Infrastructure is the
beginning of economic development. Without the means to trade or to connect
with other communities around, there is little potential in developing an economy.
This is in my opinion also the most deeply underlying issue of food insecurity,
since the lack of infrastructure does not provide people with a chance in
changing their situation. It is all out of their hands.
Utilization
The utilization of food is related to
the nutritional value of food, the preparation of food, ability of the body to
take up the nutrients and diversity of the diet. For example, a person can have access to the
right quantity of food, but if it is not prepared in the correct way or the
body is not capable of absorbing the nutrients in the food, it still results in
food insecurity. Suffering from malnutrition can be the result of food
insecurity, but does not has to be the consequence of it. Malnutrition means
that a person is suffering from a range of conditions that are hindering good
health. This is caused by inadequate food intake or poor absorption of the food
that is consumed. Malnutrition refers to both under-nutrition and
over-nutrition (World Health Organization, 2016).
Get Free Quote!
414 Experts Online