Insofar as jurisprudence is being approached from an analytical standpoint, what are the advantages of legal formalism for analysis? Similarly, what are the advantages of legal realism for analytical jurisprudence? After you have outlined the strengths of each of these analytic tools, briefly hypothesize how the formalists and the realists might explain the tortured judicial history of the Mann Act. Which theory, in your opinion, offers the better explanation?
Get Free Quote!
384 Experts Online