In Assignment 3: Using Leadership to Improve Ethical Performance, you will conduct an interview with someone who you consider a leader (e.g., current or former boss, a pastor or spiritual advisor, a friend who can be considered a leader, etc.). You will then use the information that you gather during the interview to write about the leadership characteristics he/she possesses. Take a few minutes to review the specific criteria for Assignment 3 before you begin creating the Leader Profile. Next, complete the following steps:
Note: As you think about the type of information you will need to gather from your chosen leader during the interview, use your outline from Assignment 2 as approved by your professor to guide your interview process.
Note: The leader's name I'm going to give you is my boss, His name is Richard Routh, he works for JM Lexus, it is a Lexus dealership in Margate Florida.
Now the paper:
The paper must have, the introduction, the body, the conclusion and it as to be Question 1, Answer one until the end.
APA format and double space.
Now the paper
Assignment 3: Using Leadership to Improve Ethical Performance
At this point, you should have identified the leader you would like to interview. You should also have already contacted him/her and have scheduled an interview time/date. If not, do it as soon as possible. The intention of this assignment is to describe leadership skills, ethics, and communication which impact motivation and improve ethical performance.
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
HINT: The following are some examples of questions. Feel free to select them from here. However, we urge you to revise your Assignment 2 for some ideas of what you would like to know from an experienced leader.
HINT: You should summarize the answers that you gathered in your interview. Thereafter, you should compare and contrast his / her point of view about leadership with your own perception of it.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.
Assignment 3: Using Leadership to Improve Ethical Performance
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Create five to seven (5-7) questions to ask your chosen leader to determine his / her views of motivation, ethical leadership, and performance. Then, conduct the interview based on your selected questions.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely created five to seven (5-7) questions to ask your chosen leader to determine his / her views of motivation, ethical leadership, and performance.
Partially created five to seven (5-7) questions to ask your chosen leader to determine his / her views of motivation, ethical leadership, and performance.
Satisfactorily created five to seven (5-7) questions to ask your chosen leader to determine his / her views of motivation, ethical leadership, and performance.
Thoroughly created five to seven (5-7) questions to ask your chosen leader to determine his / her views of motivation, ethical leadership, and performance.
2. Analyze the leadership, motivation, and ethical values of the leader interviewed and assess its impact on the ethical performance of the organization.
Weight: 60%
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the leadership, motivation, and ethical values of the leader interviewed and did not submit or incompletely assessed its impact on the ethical performance of the organization.
Partially analyzed the leadership, motivation, and ethical values of the leader interviewed and partially assessed its impact on the ethical performance of the organization.
Satisfactorily analyzed the leadership, motivation, and ethical values of the leader interviewed and satisfactorily assessed its impact on the ethical performance of the organization.
Thoroughly analyzed the leadership, motivation, and ethical values of the leader interviewed and thoroughly assessed its impact on the ethical performance of the organization.
3. 2 references
Weight: 10%
No references provided.
It does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Meets a number of required references; all references high-quality choices.
Exceeds the number of required references; all references high-quality choices.
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 15%
More than 6 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
Get Free Quote!
298 Experts Online