Hypotheses:
SQ1: The importance of the state of the economy into the model increases
the predictive power of Google Trends volumes on the new car model sales.
SQ2: The predictability of Google Trends volumes and the state of
economy differ between India & South Korea.
SQ3: The presence of seasonality will impact the predictability of
Google Trends volumes and the price of car sales across countries.
SQ4: The incorporation of minimum time lag into the model impact the
predictive power of optimal time lag in new car sales between India and
South Korea.
SQ5: There is a noticeable difference between the time lag between India
& South Korea.
Sub: In both countries, there
is a longer time lag for high price cars than low price cars.
The definitions in the questions merit some comments.
. - The state of the economy can be measured through the GDP or the
Industrial Production Index of the countries included in the research. The
state of the economy should be expected to be correlated with both new car
model sales and Google Trends volumes, for example, if the economy is booming
one would expect higher car sales and also an increase in web searches for
information on cars for sale (similarly one would expect the opposite behavior
if the economy is declining).
- The minimum time lag would be defined as a lag greater than zero and
less than the optimal lag that exceeds one of the confidence limits of the
cross-correlation function between new car model sales and Google Trends
volumes. The idea is that this lag represents those buyers who do less web
search before making the purchase, by including only the optimal lag you are
omitting information about this market niche. It is assumed that incorporating
the optimal lag improves forecasting[1]
and we want to evaluate whether the additional inclusion of the minimum time
lag increases the predictive capacity of the model. For example, in the graph
of the cross-correlation function on page 44 of the sample thesis, the minimum
time lag would be 1.
- The maximum lag is defined as the more distant lag greater than the
optimal lag that exceeds one of the confidence limits of the cross-correlation
function between new car model sales and Google Trends volumes. The idea is
that this lag represents those buyers who require many web searches before
deciding to buy, as in the previous case this is a market niche whose
information is omitted if we incorporate only the optimal lag. For example, in
the graph of the cross-correlation function on page 44 of the sample thesis,
the maximum lag would be 10.
. - In models whose main purpose is to predict, seasonality plays an
important role, in some cases its effect is positive and in others negative.
For this reason I propose to evaluate how its presence affects and for this purpose
we would use as a benchmark the model including the Google Trends volumes and
the state of the economy with all the seasonally adjusted series and we would
compare it (using R2 or MSFE)[2]
against the model that includes all the previous variables without seasonally
adjusted. The seasonal decomposition method would be used to construct the
seasonally adjusted series.
MSFE = Mean Squared Forecast Error
Get Free Quote!
360 Experts Online