Thomas Malthus reasoned that because amount of land is fixed, as population grows and more and more labour is applied to land, the productivity of labour in food production would decline, leading to widespread famine, Malthus’s prediction failed to materi

business

Description

Thomas Malthus reasoned that because amount of land is fixed, as population grows and more and more labour is applied to land, the productivity of labour in food production would decline, leading to widespread famine, Malthus’s prediction failed to materialise as advances in technology greatly increased labour productivity in food production. Do such technological advances contradict the law of diminishing marginal returns? Why do you think the motorcar production exhibits strong economies of scale but not the trucking (haulage) industry?


Related Questions in business category


Disclaimer
The ready solutions purchased from Library are already used solutions. Please do not submit them directly as it may lead to plagiarism. Once paid, the solution file download link will be sent to your provided email. Please either use them for learning purpose or re-write them in your own language. In case if you haven't get the email, do let us know via chat support.