What are the individual , organizational and social consequences of Kobe Steel’s practice ?
business
Description
Essay sections
Your reflective essay must have the following sections :
1. Brief answers to questions (a) to (e) . (400 words)
a. What did Kobe
Steel do ?
b. What values of
Kobe Steel’s behavior differed from the expected ?
c. What are the
individual , organizational and social consequences of Kobe Steel’s practice ?
d. How do you feel
after reading the case ?
e. In which other
occasions have you felt like this ?
2. Your understanding of Kant’s Ethics . (500 words)
3. Application of Kant’s Ethics to the Kobe Steel’s case
study . (500 words)
4. Using Kant’s Ethics and your values , explain what you
would have done differently as the former Chief Executive Officer Kobe Steel
when placed in the same situation . (600 words)
Marking Criteria
|
Criteria |
Marks |
High
Distinction (over 85%) |
Distinction
(75-84%) |
Credit
(65-74%) |
Pass (50-64%) |
Needs
improvement (under 50%) |
|
Quality
of answers to case study questions using multiple stakeholder perspectives |
4 |
Excellent
quality answers using a range of stakeholder perspectives |
Very
good quality answers using some stakeholder perspectives |
Good
quality answers using two stakeholder perspectives |
Average
quality answers using one stakeholder perspective |
Low
quality answers using no stakeholder perspective |
|
Understanding
and application of Kantian theory |
8 |
Quality
of essay reflects an outstanding understanding of Kantian theory and the
ability to demonstrate the application of the theory to case study. |
Quality
of essay reflects a deep understanding of Kantian theory and the ability to
demonstrate the application of the theory to case study. |
Quality
of essay reflects a sound understanding of Kantian theory and the ability to
demonstrate the application of the theory to case study. |
Quality
of essay reflects a basic understanding of Kantian theory and the ability to
demonstrate the application of the theory to case study |
There is
inadequate understanding of Kantian theory and/or inadequate application of
the theory to case study. |
|
Quality
of reflective insights using personal values |
6 |
Quality
of essay reflects outstanding reflective insights using personal values |
Quality
of essay reflects deep reflective insights using personal values |
Quality
of essay reflects sound reflective insights using personal values |
Quality
of essay reflects basic reflective insights using personal values |
Quality
of essay reflects inadequate reflective insights using personal values |
|
Referencing |
4 |
Excellent
referencing, citations and style used throughout. Full Turnitin report
attached. |
Good
referencing, citations and style applied throughout. Minor omissions in
Turnitin report, reference list, citations or style. Full Turnitin report attached. |
Good
referencing, citations and style applied throughout. Minor omissions in
Turnitin report, reference list, citations or style. Full Turnitin report
attached. |
Good
referencing, citations and style applied throughout. Minor omissions in
Turnitin report, reference list, citations or style. Full Turnitin report
attached. |
Basic or
little attempt on referencing, citations and style throughout. There are
major issues in the Turnitin report, reference list, citations or style. Full
Turnitin report not attached. |
