Description
TMA-01
Answer the following questions based on article :
Study
Kotter, John P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts
fail. Harvard Business Review, 1995(March-April), 59-67 and answer the
following questions:
1) What are
the underlying assumptions about people in organisations and how they should be
managed in Kotter’s (1995) approach to change management? Consider all the
schools of management thought that you have studied and select elements from
different theories and historical periods to build the arguments linking the
theories with specific aspects of Kotter’s (1995) approach.
2) Describe
an organisational change initiative that you have experienced at work using
Kotter’s (1995) framework. How well does the 8-step transformation process
describe your experiences? What are the strengths and what are the limitations
of the theory?
3) Research the
famous change management case Shell’s Downstream One (you can start from this
article: Rossi, Ben. (2013). Shell delivers 'milestone' upgrade project. Information
Age. Retrieved from https://www.information-age.com/shell-delivers-milestone-upgrade-project-123457439/ ). Who do you
think are the stakeholders of this initiative? Which do you think are the
sources and indicators of the power of the different stakeholder groups you can
identify?
Instructions
- Copy the question text and give your answer underneath it. Each
answer should not exceed 750 words, excluding the reference list. Make sure
you note the total number of words in a parenthesis at the end of each
question.
- Support your answers with references to academic journal articles
and provide a full reference list at the end of each question. Use the
Harvard referencing system (you can find instructions here: http://www.open.ac.uk/libraryservices/documents/Harvard_citation_hlp.pdf
- Pay special attention to the correct and precise use of
terminology and models. You do not need to
define the terms or describe the models, but if you use terms and models
not found in your course material you should cite the source.
- Review the academic literature to identify the strengths and
limitations of the theories you discuss and critically assess the
arguments made in the literature vis-à-vis the facts of
the case you discuss. Use the literature review to support the opinions
you express.
- Do use tables, diagrams, models and maps to illustrate your
conceptualisations as much as you can. Redraw models with your own data
and avoid using visuals borrowed from online or other sources. If you must
use infographics or artwork that is not designed by you, then you should
clearly indicate your source.
- If you feel that you do not have enough work experience, you
can interview someone you know well that has. Make sure you clarify if the
data you use are from your experience or someone else’s and also provide a
brief introduction to the organisation. Your answers are strictly
confidential, but if you feel insecure about using corporate data you can
use fictitious names for the organisation, or the people involved.